Repository

Case Repository

11–20 of 23 cases
  1. Supreme Court of India Criminal Appeal No. 1266 of 1998 [(2005) 13 SCC 766]

    State of Himachal Pradesh v. Asha Ram

    Ratio

    Conviction can be based on the sole testimony of the child survivor. Corroboration of the child survivor’s testimony is only a general prudence necessitated in certain circumstances and is not a requirement of law. Minor inconsistencies are immaterial and must not form a ground for throwing out an otherwise reliable prosecution case.

    Pincites

    Para 5, 15-20; Page 5, 8-10

  2. High Court of Bombay [2021 SCC OnLine Bom 511]

    Imran Shabbir Gauri Vs. State of Maharashtra

    Ratio

    The court held that the concerned authorities of the State Government or Central Government will take some initiative in incorporating certain amendments under relevant laws so as to give status to Section 164 statement as that of examination-in-chief in all eventualities. The trauma that a victim has to undergo, after the incident does not stop…

    Pincites

    Para 48; Page 13, 14

  3. Supreme Court of India Criminal Appeal No. 616 of 1985 [(1996) 2 SCC 384]

    State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh

    Ratio

    Corroborative evidence is not an imperative component of judicial credence in every case of rape. If the testimony of the child is reliable and inspires confidence, courts can convict on the disposition of the child victim alone. Supposed considerations which have no material effect on the veracity of the prosecution case or even discrepancies in…

    Pincites

    Para 9 and 13 Page 5-7, 10

  4. Supreme Court of India (2022) 2 SCC 74

    Phool Singh v. State of MP

    Ratio

    Conviction can be based on the sole testimony of the survivor, without any further corroboration, provided the testimony is found reliable and trustworthy. Even in the absence of any external or internal injuries on the person of the survivor, the conviction can be sustained.

    Pincites

    Para 4-11, Pages 3-11

  5. Supreme Court of India (2020) 10 SCC 573

    Ganesan v. State

    Ratio

    In cases where the child survivor is found to be worthy of credence and reliable even if other witnesses turn hostile, conviction can be based on her sole testimony. No corroboration is required.

    Pincites

    Para 8.1-12, Pages 4-9

  6. Supreme Court of India (2017) 2 SCC 51

    State of Himachal Pradesh v. Sanjay Kumar alias Sunny

    Ratio

    The testimony of a survivor in sexual offences cases is vital unless compelling reasons necessitate corroboration. Courts should find no difficulty to convict on the testimony of the survivor of a sexual assault alone if the testimony inspires confidence.

    Pincites

    Para 31, Page 11

  7. Supreme Court of India (2010) 8 SCC 191

    Vijay alias Chinee v. State of Madhya Pradesh

    Ratio

    Conviction can be based solely on the testimony of the child survivor if it is trustworthy and reliable, even in the absence of corroborating evidence or injuries. Minor discrepancies in her does not make it unreliable.

    Pincites

    Para 9-15 Page 195-198, 204, 205

  8. Supreme Court of India (2000) 5 SCC 30

    State of Rajasthan v. N.K

    Ratio

    Convictions for rape can be founded solely on the testimony of the survivor, without the need for corroboration. However, if the court finds the testimony insufficiently credible on its own, it may seek additional evidence to bolster the survivor's account. A survivor's testimony under oath should be believed unless the testimony is such as would…

    Pincites

    Para 11, 19 Page 39,42-44

  9. High Court of Delhi Crl. A. 1288/2019 [(2022) 293 DLT 236]

    Parsu Ram vs. State

    Ratio

    The conviction can be based even on the uncorroborated evidence of the child survivor, if the same inspires confidence. The Courts should examine the broader probabilities of a case and not get swayed by minor contradictions or insignificant discrepancies in the statement of the child survivor, which are not of a fatal nature, to throw…

    Pincites

    Para 11-21, 17, 22-23, 26,28 Page 3, 4, 5-7

  10. High Court of Delhi Crl. A. 71/2021 and Crl. M. (BAIL) 150/2021 [2021 SCC OnLine Del 2391]

    Sunil Kumar vs. State of NCT Delhi.

    Ratio

    If the statement of the victim inspires confidence, then the court may convict on the statement alone. Relied on State of Himachal Pradesh v. Manga Singh and State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh.

    Pincites

    Para 18-19; Page 4