Repository

Case Repository

1–3 of 3 cases
  1. Supreme Court of India Crl. A. No. 1820 of 2017 [AIR 2017 SC 5414 ]

    State of Maharashtra v. Bandu

    Ratio

    There is a need to create a conducive environment to encourage vulnerable witnesses to make their statements. Screens or a similar arrangement must be made to ensure that they don’t see the face or body of the accused. Questions for cross examination must be given in writing to the presiding officer of the Court who…

    Pincites

    Para 10; Page 2

  2. Supreme Court of India Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 33 of 1997 [(2004) 5 SCC 518]

    Sakshi v. Union of India

    Ratio

    Guidelines laid down specifically for recording of evidence of in cases of child sexual abuse:(i) a screen or some such arrangements may be made where the victim or witnesses (who may be equally vulnerable like the victim) do not see the body or face of the accused; (ii) the questions put in cross-examination on behalf…

    Pincites

    Para 1, 34; Page 1, 18.1

  3. High Court of Manipur Crl. Petn. No. 7 of 2019 [2019 SCC OnLine Mani 164]

    Lalsuonglien and Ors. v. State of Manipur

    Ratio

    Provisions of the POCSO reiterated by the court: The child may have a parent or other trusted person present at the time of testifying and can call for assistance from an interpreter, special educator, or other professional while giving evidence; further, the child is not to be called repeatedly to testify in Court and may…

    Pincites

    Para 2, 15, 17, 19, 22; Page 1, 3, 4