Repository

Case Repository

1–4 of 4 cases
  1. Supreme Court of India Crl. A. No. 1820 of 2017 [AIR 2017 SC 5414 ]

    State of Maharashtra v. Bandu

    Ratio

    There is a need to create a conducive environment to encourage vulnerable witnesses to make their statements. Screens or a similar arrangement must be made to ensure that they don’t see the face or body of the accused. Questions for cross examination must be given in writing to the presiding officer of the Court who…

    Pincites

    Para 10; Page 2

  2. Supreme Court of India Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 33 of 1997 [(2004) 5 SCC 518]

    Sakshi v. Union of India

    Ratio

    Guidelines laid down specifically for recording of evidence of in cases of child sexual abuse:(i) a screen or some such arrangements may be made where the victim or witnesses (who may be equally vulnerable like the victim) do not see the body or face of the accused; (ii) the questions put in cross-examination on behalf…

    Pincites

    Para 1, 34; Page 1, 18.1

  3. Supreme Court of India Criminal Appeal No. 1410 of 2021 (AIR2022SC13)

    Attorney General of India and Ors. v. Satish and Ors.

    Ratio

    While sexual intent under S. 8 POCSO is a question of fact, the Court is entitled to raise the presumption under S. 30 POCSO with regard to the culpable state of mind of the accused when the court is satisfied with the existence of a fact beyond reasonable doubt.

    Pincites

    Para 36-37, 42; Page 15, 17

  4. Supreme Court of India Criminal Appeal Nos. 1097-1098 of 2018 (MANU/SC/0167/2022)

    Pappu v. State of Uttar Pradesh

    Ratio

    Where foundational facts have been established, the presumption under section 29 POCSO becomes operational and the accused is bound to rebut the presumption.

    Pincites

    Para 32; Page 39 & 40.