Repository

Case Repository

1–2 of 2 cases
  1. Supreme Court of India (Crl.) No. 5073/2011 [(2014) 8 SCC 913]

    The State of Karnataka by Nonavinakere Police v. Shivanna alias Tarkari Shivanna

    Ratio

    The high court issued interim directions to all the police stations for the recording of 164 statement: The investigating officer should preferably be female. The IO shall take immediate steps to take the prosecutrix to a female MM magistrate for the recording of the 164 statement, within 24 hours. In case the time period is…

    Pincites

    Para 1, 2, 9; Page 1, 3

  2. High Court of Madras Crl. O.P. No. 12148 of 2017 [2017 Cri LJ 5011]

    Murugasamy Vs. The State and Ors.

    Ratio

    The court, in this case, analysed the procedure to record 164 statements of the victim/witness i.e- once the magistrate records a 164 statement, a record of the statement should be sent to the investigating officer and the jurisdictional court. The statement should not be made public. The court also observed that the term “Magistrate” under…

    Pincites

    Para 17, 21, 24, 28, 44, 48, 50, 51; Page 8-10, 14-17