Showing 1–2 of 2 cases

High Court of Kerala High Court of Manipur

  1. High Court of Manipur 2019 SCC OnLine Mani 164

    Lalsuonglien and Ors. v. State of Manipur

    The child may have a parent or other trusted person present at the time of testifying and can call for assistance from an interpreter, special educator, or other professional while giving evidence. Further, the Court held that the child is not to be called repeatedly to testify in Court and may testify through a video…

    Pincites  Para 2, 15, 17, 19, 22; Page 1, 3, 4 Read case : Lalsuonglien and Ors. v. State of Manipur

  2. High Court of Kerala WA No. 1651 of 2020

    Justin v. Union of India and Ors.

    Sections 29 and 30 of the POCSO Act are held to be Constitutional and they do not violate the Fundamental Rights, nor are they contrary to the basic criminal Principles. Presumption under Sections 29 and 30 POCSO would become operational only after the prosecution has established the foundational facts beyond reasonable doubt.

    Pincites  Para 21-31, 35; Page 15-18 Read case : Justin v. Union of India and Ors.