Home Cases Evidentiary Value of Child Testimony
Repository

Evidentiary Value of Child Testimony

11–20 of 20 cases
  1. Supreme Court of India (2022) 2 SCC 74

    Phool Singh v. State of MP

    Ratio

    Conviction can be based on the sole testimony of the survivor, without any further corroboration, provided the testimony is found reliable and trustworthy. Even in the absence of any external or internal injuries on the person of the survivor, the conviction can be sustained.

    Pincites

    Para 4-11, Pages 3-11

  2. Supreme Court of India (2020) 10 SCC 573

    Ganesan v. State

    Ratio

    In cases where the child survivor is found to be worthy of credence and reliable even if other witnesses turn hostile, conviction can be based on her sole testimony. No corroboration is required.

    Pincites

    Para 8.1-12, Pages 4-9

  3. Supreme Court of India (2017) 2 SCC 51

    State of Himachal Pradesh v. Sanjay Kumar alias Sunny

    Ratio

    The testimony of a survivor in sexual offences cases is vital unless compelling reasons necessitate corroboration. Courts should find no difficulty to convict on the testimony of the survivor of a sexual assault alone if the testimony inspires confidence.

    Pincites

    Para 31, Page 11

  4. Supreme Court of India (2010) 8 SCC 191

    Vijay alias Chinee v. State of Madhya Pradesh

    Ratio

    Conviction can be based solely on the testimony of the child survivor if it is trustworthy and reliable, even in the absence of corroborating evidence or injuries. Minor discrepancies in her does not make it unreliable.

    Pincites

    Para 9-15 Page 195-198, 204, 205

  5. Supreme Court of India (2000) 5 SCC 30

    State of Rajasthan v. N.K

    Ratio

    Convictions for rape can be founded solely on the testimony of the survivor, without the need for corroboration. However, if the court finds the testimony insufficiently credible on its own, it may seek additional evidence to bolster the survivor's account. A survivor's testimony under oath should be believed unless the testimony is such as would…

    Pincites

    Para 11, 19 Page 39,42-44

  6. High Court of Delhi Crl. A. 1288/2019 [(2022) 293 DLT 236]

    Parsu Ram vs. State

    Ratio

    The conviction can be based even on the uncorroborated evidence of the child survivor, if the same inspires confidence. The Courts should examine the broader probabilities of a case and not get swayed by minor contradictions or insignificant discrepancies in the statement of the child survivor, which are not of a fatal nature, to throw…

    Pincites

    Para 11-21, 17, 22-23, 26,28 Page 3, 4, 5-7

  7. High Court of Delhi Crl. A. 71/2021 and Crl. M. (BAIL) 150/2021 [2021 SCC OnLine Del 2391]

    Sunil Kumar vs. State of NCT Delhi.

    Ratio

    If the statement of the victim inspires confidence, then the court may convict on the statement alone. Relied on State of Himachal Pradesh v. Manga Singh and State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh.

    Pincites

    Para 18-19; Page 4

  8. High Court of Delhi CRL.A. 1231/2018 [2020 SCC OnLine Del 1378]

    Ishwer Soni v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

    Ratio

    It is well settled that in a case of rape, the finding of guilt can be recorded even on the basis of uncorroborated testimony of the child survivor provided it is cogent and reliable. Even in a case of penetration, the consistent judicial diktat is that absence of injuries may not always be fatal to…

    Pincites

    Para 16-18, 20; Page 4

  9. High Court of Delhi 2021 SCC OnLine Del 4380 : (2021) 227 AIC 475

    Mohan Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)

    Ratio

    The child survivor being of tender age may have contradictions in their testimony. However, if they are consistent in their testimony as to the incident and are able to identify the accused, they would be considered a competent witness and their testimony may be admitted.

    Pincites

    para 19, 23 & 24.

  10. High Court of Bombay Criminal Appeal No. 99 of 2016 [2022 (4) Bom CR (Cri) 182]

    Vitthal Rajendra Jogade v. State of Maharashtra

    Ratio

    Absence of any injuries on the person of the child survivor might not by itself discredit the statement of the child survivor and in such a situation the non-production of a medical report would not be of much consequence if the other evidence was believable. Corroboration is not the sine qua non for a conviction…

    Pincites

    Para 12; Page 4